Child Maintenance Enforcement Commission
Author | : Great Britain: National Audit Office |
Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
Total Pages | : 48 |
Release | : 2012-02-29 |
ISBN-10 | : 0102975418 |
ISBN-13 | : 9780102975413 |
Rating | : 4/5 (413 Downloads) |
Download or read book Child Maintenance Enforcement Commission written by Great Britain: National Audit Office and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2012-02-29 with total page 48 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Plans by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission to reduce its spending are high risk. There is already a £44 million shortfall in the £161 million reduction originally expected by 2014-15. The Commission is reliant on raising £71 million in fee income from parents as part of its planned savings. These estimates are very uncertain, increasing the risk that additional cuts might be needed late on in the Spending Review that could have an adverse effect on services. The existing child maintenance schemes were problematic from the start and large backlogs of work built up. Efficiency has improved since 2006 and the cost of administering child maintenance has reduced. There are, however, strong indications that costs remain high and questions remain about the relative efficiency of the Commission. The Commission does not monitor staff productivity adequately and operated with duplicate management, finance and HR functions in 2010-11 because it retained the former Child Support Agency as a separate division. The Commission has 70 offices, a quite different arrangement from the head office and six processing centres originally planned by the Child Support Agency. The planned cost reductions rely heavily on the introduction of a new child maintenance scheme and associated IT system. Yet IT costs have increased and the Commission risks repeating some of the mistakes made on the earlier child maintenance schemes. The estimates for fee income include assumptions that the NAO cannot substantiate. There is no contingency plan if forecast income for the last year of the Spending Review in 2014-15 proves optimistic