Rational Lawmaking under Review

Rational Lawmaking under Review
Author :
Publisher : Springer
Total Pages : 409
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9783319332178
ISBN-13 : 3319332171
Rating : 4/5 (171 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Rational Lawmaking under Review by : Klaus Meßerschmidt

Download or read book Rational Lawmaking under Review written by Klaus Meßerschmidt and published by Springer. This book was released on 2016-07-26 with total page 409 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court ́s approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers’ duty to legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on ‘legisprudence under review’, this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.


Rational Lawmaking under Review Related Books

Rational Lawmaking under Review
Language: en
Pages: 409
Authors: Klaus Meßerschmidt
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-07-26 - Publisher: Springer

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court ́s approach to ration
Due Process of Lawmaking
Language: en
Pages: 309
Authors: Susan Rose-Ackerman
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015-01-22 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

With nuanced perspective and detailed case studies, Due Process of Lawmaking explores the law of lawmaking in the United States, South Africa, Germany, and the
Handbook of Parliamentary Studies
Language: en
Pages: 512
Authors: Cyril Benoît
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2020-11-27 - Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This comprehensive Handbook takes a multidisciplinary approach to the study of parliaments, offering novel insights into the key aspects of legislatures, legisl
The Equilibrium of Parliamentary Law-making
Language: en
Pages: 212
Authors: Viktor Kazai
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2024-08-01 - Publisher: Taylor & Francis

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book is a response to the dangers posed to constitutional democracy by the continuous growth of executive power and the simultaneous decline of parliaments
The Nature of Legislative Intent
Language: en
Pages: 318
Authors: Richard Ekins
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2012-10-12 - Publisher: OUP Oxford

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Are legislatures able to form and act on intentions? The question matters because the interpretation of statutes is often thought to centre on the intention of