Download or read book Slow Streets as a Traffic Calming Method written by Parin Patel and published by . This book was released on 2023 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Slow streets or shared streets stem from the woonerf street concept, which limits vehicle through traffic and allows for a safe place for residents to access the street to walk, bike, and play (Appleyard and Appleyard, 2021). In San Francisco, a new street type, slow streets, was introduced through a COVID-19 emergency response program. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) is a City and County of San Francisco department which manages all ground transportation in the city (SFMTA, n.d.-a). The SFMTA's Slow Streets Program allowed a handful of residential streets to limit vehicle traffic to local traffic and provide people space to recreate while social distancing. The program quickly installed slow streets across the city without going through a planning process. With slow streets established as a permanent street use, planners are working backward to determine the feasibility and safety needs of maintaining these streets. The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) was founded in 1996 as an association of North American cities and transit agencies to support and provide solutions to transportation issues. Using the NACTO's guide for slow street design, this research aims to provide planners with best practices and recommendations for the ten slow streets. All ten slow streets are in phase one of the planning process, as the Shared Spaces Program identified these slow streets and established them for permanence. Through data collection and surveys, each slow street would fall into one of the three following planning phases: phase two- engagement, phase three- design and implementation, or phase four- monitoring. This paper explores the relationship between San Francisco's quick-implemented slow streets and how they compare to parameters set by long-standing shared streets. This research uses a methodology adopted from Pogačar, K., Žižek, A., and Šenk to compare existing parameters of shared streets to San Francisco slow streets. Following this, the paper examines the existing conditions of each slow street using Google Streetview. The Slow Streets Program provided data on vehicle traffic counts, speeds, collisions, and survey responses to determine if slow streets reduced traffic and created safe streets for the residents. Results from the comparison framework and existing conditions show that 12th Ave., Cabrillo St., and Somerset St. slow streets successfully reduce through traffic but lack resident support, aligning with step two of the planning process: engagement with the community and residents. Hearst Ave. and Noe St. slow streets require further data collection and evaluation to reduce through traffic, aligning with step three: design and implementation. Minnesota St. also falls within step three of the planning process, as the community created a safe space for people to walk, bike, and play even when the slow street does not align with shared street parameters. Lastly, 23rd Ave., Arlington St., Clay St., and Lyon St. slow streets align with the final step of the planning process: monitoring. The research concludes that slow streets are not a 'one size fits all' method, and their use for traffic calming and support by residents varies across the city. While the slow street parameters are valuable for identifying current and future slow streets, the existing conditions and residents' support are significant factors in determining long-term feasibility.